Features: - Automated datacenter documentation generation - MCP integration for device connectivity - Auto-remediation engine with safety checks - Multi-factor reliability scoring (0-100%) - Human feedback learning loop - Pattern recognition and continuous improvement - Agentic chat support with AI - API for ticket resolution - Frontend React with Material-UI - CI/CD pipelines (GitLab + Gitea) - Docker & Kubernetes deployment - Complete documentation and guides v2.0 Highlights: - Auto-remediation with write operations (disabled by default) - Reliability calculator with 4-factor scoring - Human feedback system for continuous learning - Pattern-based progressive automation - Approval workflow for critical actions - Full audit trail and rollback capability
530 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
530 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
# 🎉 What's New in v2.0 - Auto-Remediation & Feedback System
|
||
|
||
## 🚀 Major New Features
|
||
|
||
### 1️⃣ Auto-Remediation (Write Operations) ⚠️
|
||
|
||
**AI can now automatically fix problems** by executing write operations on your infrastructure.
|
||
|
||
#### Key Points:
|
||
- ✅ **DEFAULT: DISABLED** - Must explicitly enable per ticket for safety
|
||
- ✅ **Smart Decision Engine** - Only executes when confidence is high
|
||
- ✅ **Safety Checks** - Pre/post validation, backups, rollbacks
|
||
- ✅ **Approval Workflow** - Critical actions require human approval
|
||
- ✅ **Full Audit Trail** - Every action logged
|
||
|
||
#### Example Usage:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Submit ticket WITH auto-remediation
|
||
{
|
||
"ticket_id": "INC-001",
|
||
"description": "Web service not responding",
|
||
"category": "server",
|
||
"enable_auto_remediation": true # ← Enable write operations
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# AI will:
|
||
# 1. Analyze the problem
|
||
# 2. Check reliability score
|
||
# 3. If score ≥85% and safe action → Execute automatically
|
||
# 4. If critical action → Request approval
|
||
# 5. Log all actions taken
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**What AI Can Do:**
|
||
- Restart services/VMs
|
||
- Clear caches
|
||
- Scale deployments
|
||
- Enable network ports
|
||
- Expand storage volumes
|
||
- Rollback deployments
|
||
|
||
**Safety Guardrails:**
|
||
- Minimum 85% reliability required
|
||
- Rate limiting (max 10 actions/hour)
|
||
- Time windows (maintenance hours only)
|
||
- Backup verification
|
||
- System health checks
|
||
- Rollback on failure
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2️⃣ Reliability Scoring System 📊
|
||
|
||
**Multi-factor confidence calculation** that gets smarter over time.
|
||
|
||
#### How It Works:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Reliability Score (0-100%) =
|
||
AI Confidence × 25% + # Claude's confidence
|
||
Human Feedback × 30% + # User ratings & feedback
|
||
Historical Success × 25% + # Past resolution success rate
|
||
Pattern Recognition × 20% # Similarity to known issues
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### Confidence Levels:
|
||
|
||
| Score | Level | Action |
|
||
|-------|-------|--------|
|
||
| 90-100% | 🟢 Very High | Auto-execute without approval |
|
||
| 75-89% | 🔵 High | Auto-execute or require approval |
|
||
| 60-74% | 🟡 Medium | Require approval |
|
||
| 0-59% | 🔴 Low | Manual resolution only |
|
||
|
||
#### Example:
|
||
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"reliability_score": 87.5,
|
||
"confidence_level": "high",
|
||
"breakdown": {
|
||
"ai_confidence": "92%",
|
||
"human_validation": "85%",
|
||
"success_history": "90%",
|
||
"pattern_recognition": "82%"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 3️⃣ Human Feedback Loop 🔄
|
||
|
||
**Your feedback makes the AI smarter.**
|
||
|
||
#### What You Can Provide:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
{
|
||
"ticket_id": "INC-001",
|
||
"feedback_type": "positive|negative|neutral",
|
||
"rating": 5, // 1-5 stars
|
||
"was_helpful": true,
|
||
"resolution_accurate": true,
|
||
"actions_worked": true,
|
||
|
||
// Optional details
|
||
"comment": "Perfect! Service is back up.",
|
||
"what_worked": "The service restart fixed it",
|
||
"what_didnt_work": null,
|
||
"suggestions": "Could add health check step",
|
||
|
||
// If AI failed, what actually worked?
|
||
"actual_resolution": "Had to increase memory instead",
|
||
"time_to_resolve": 30.0 // minutes
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### Impact of Feedback:
|
||
|
||
1. **Immediate**: Updates reliability score for that ticket
|
||
2. **Pattern Learning**: Strengthens/weakens similar issue handling
|
||
3. **Future Decisions**: Influences auto-remediation eligibility
|
||
4. **System Improvement**: Better resolutions over time
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 4️⃣ Pattern Learning & Recognition 🧠
|
||
|
||
**AI learns from repeated issues** and gets better at handling them.
|
||
|
||
#### How Patterns Work:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Issue occurs first time:
|
||
└─ Manual resolution, collect feedback
|
||
|
||
After 5+ similar issues with good feedback:
|
||
├─ Pattern identified and eligible for auto-remediation
|
||
├─ Success rate: 85%+
|
||
└─ Can auto-fix similar issues in future
|
||
|
||
After 20+ occurrences:
|
||
├─ Very high confidence (90%+)
|
||
├─ Success rate: 92%+
|
||
└─ Auto-fix without approval (if safe action)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### Pattern Eligibility Criteria:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
eligible_for_auto_remediation = (
|
||
occurrence_count >= 5 AND
|
||
positive_feedback_rate >= 0.85 AND
|
||
avg_reliability_score >= 85.0 AND
|
||
auto_remediation_success_rate >= 0.85
|
||
)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📋 New Database Models
|
||
|
||
### Tables Added:
|
||
|
||
1. **ticket_feedbacks** - Store human feedback
|
||
2. **similar_tickets** - Track pattern similarities
|
||
3. **remediation_logs** - Audit trail of actions
|
||
4. **auto_remediation_policies** - Configuration per category
|
||
5. **remediation_approvals** - Approval workflow
|
||
6. **ticket_patterns** - Learned patterns
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🔧 New API Endpoints
|
||
|
||
### Core Functionality
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Create ticket with auto-remediation
|
||
POST /api/v1/tickets
|
||
{
|
||
"enable_auto_remediation": true # New parameter
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# Get enhanced ticket status
|
||
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}
|
||
# Returns: reliability_score, remediation_decision, etc.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Feedback System
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Submit feedback
|
||
POST /api/v1/feedback
|
||
|
||
# Get ticket feedback history
|
||
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/feedback
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Auto-Remediation Control
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Approve/reject remediation
|
||
POST /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/approve-remediation
|
||
|
||
# Get remediation execution logs
|
||
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/remediation-logs
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Analytics & Monitoring
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Reliability statistics
|
||
GET /api/v1/stats/reliability?days=30&category=network
|
||
|
||
# Auto-remediation statistics
|
||
GET /api/v1/stats/auto-remediation?days=30
|
||
|
||
# View learned patterns
|
||
GET /api/v1/patterns?category=network&min_occurrences=5
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎨 Frontend Enhancements
|
||
|
||
### New UI Components:
|
||
|
||
1. **Auto-Remediation Toggle** (with safety warning)
|
||
2. **Reliability Score Display** (with breakdown)
|
||
3. **Feedback Form** (star rating, comments, detailed feedback)
|
||
4. **Remediation Logs Viewer** (audit trail)
|
||
5. **Analytics Dashboard** (reliability trends, success rates)
|
||
6. **Pattern Viewer** (learned patterns and eligibility)
|
||
|
||
### Visual Indicators:
|
||
|
||
- 🟢 Green: Very high reliability (90%+)
|
||
- 🔵 Blue: High reliability (75-89%)
|
||
- 🟡 Yellow: Medium reliability (60-74%)
|
||
- 🔴 Red: Low reliability (<60%)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📊 Example Workflow
|
||
|
||
### Traditional Flow (v1.0)
|
||
```
|
||
1. User submits ticket
|
||
2. AI analyzes and suggests resolution
|
||
3. User manually executes actions
|
||
4. Done
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Enhanced Flow (v2.0)
|
||
```
|
||
1. User submits ticket with auto_remediation=true
|
||
2. AI analyzes problem
|
||
3. AI calculates reliability score
|
||
4. Decision Engine evaluates:
|
||
├─ High confidence + safe action → Execute automatically
|
||
├─ Medium confidence → Request approval
|
||
└─ Low confidence → Manual resolution only
|
||
5. If approved/auto-approved:
|
||
├─ Pre-execution safety checks
|
||
├─ Execute actions via MCP
|
||
├─ Post-execution validation
|
||
└─ Log all actions
|
||
6. User provides feedback
|
||
7. System learns and improves
|
||
8. Future similar issues → Faster, smarter resolution
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎯 Use Cases
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 1: Service Down
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Ticket: "Web service not responding"
|
||
# Category: server
|
||
# Auto-remediation: enabled
|
||
|
||
AI Analysis:
|
||
├─ Identifies: Service crash
|
||
├─ Solution: Restart service
|
||
├─ Reliability: 92% (based on 15 similar past issues)
|
||
├─ Action type: safe_write
|
||
└─ Decision: Auto-execute without approval
|
||
|
||
Result:
|
||
├─ Service restarted in 3 seconds
|
||
├─ Health check: passed
|
||
├─ Action logged
|
||
└─ User feedback: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
||
|
||
Future:
|
||
└─ Similar issues auto-fixed with 95% confidence
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 2: Storage Full
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Ticket: "Datastore at 98% capacity"
|
||
# Category: storage
|
||
# Auto-remediation: enabled
|
||
|
||
AI Analysis:
|
||
├─ Identifies: Storage capacity issue
|
||
├─ Solution: Expand volume by 100GB
|
||
├─ Reliability: 88%
|
||
├─ Action type: critical_write (expansion can't be undone easily)
|
||
└─ Decision: Require approval
|
||
|
||
Workflow:
|
||
├─ Approval requested from admin
|
||
├─ Admin reviews and approves
|
||
├─ Pre-check: Backup verified
|
||
├─ Volume expanded
|
||
├─ Post-check: New space available
|
||
└─ Logged with approval trail
|
||
|
||
Future:
|
||
└─ After 10+ successful expansions, may auto-approve
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 3: Network Port Flapping
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Ticket: "Port Gi0/1 flapping on switch"
|
||
# Category: network
|
||
# Auto-remediation: enabled
|
||
|
||
AI Analysis:
|
||
├─ Identifies: Interface errors causing flapping
|
||
├─ Solution: Clear interface errors, bounce port
|
||
├─ Reliability: 78% (only 3 similar past issues)
|
||
├─ Pattern: Not yet eligible for auto-remediation
|
||
└─ Decision: Require approval (not enough history)
|
||
|
||
After 5+ similar issues with good feedback:
|
||
└─ Pattern becomes eligible
|
||
└─ Future port issues auto-fixed
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🔐 Security & Safety
|
||
|
||
### Built-in Safety Features:
|
||
|
||
1. ✅ **Explicit Opt-in**: Auto-remediation disabled by default
|
||
2. ✅ **Action Classification**: Safe vs. critical operations
|
||
3. ✅ **Reliability Thresholds**: Minimum 85% for auto-execution
|
||
4. ✅ **Approval Workflow**: Critical actions require human OK
|
||
5. ✅ **Rate Limiting**: Max 10 actions per hour
|
||
6. ✅ **Pre-execution Checks**: Health, backups, time windows
|
||
7. ✅ **Post-execution Validation**: Verify success
|
||
8. ✅ **Rollback Capability**: Undo on failure
|
||
9. ✅ **Full Audit Trail**: Every action logged
|
||
10. ✅ **Pattern Validation**: Only proven patterns get auto-remediation
|
||
|
||
### What AI Will NEVER Do:
|
||
|
||
- ❌ Delete data without approval
|
||
- ❌ Modify critical configs without approval
|
||
- ❌ Shutdown production systems without approval
|
||
- ❌ Execute during business hours (if restricted)
|
||
- ❌ Exceed rate limits
|
||
- ❌ Act on low-confidence issues
|
||
- ❌ Proceed if safety checks fail
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📈 Expected Benefits
|
||
|
||
### Operational Efficiency
|
||
|
||
- **90% reduction** in time to resolution for common issues
|
||
- **80% of repetitive issues** auto-resolved
|
||
- **<3 seconds** average resolution time for known patterns
|
||
- **24/7 automated response** even outside business hours
|
||
|
||
### Quality Improvements
|
||
|
||
- **Consistent** resolutions (no human error)
|
||
- **Learning** from feedback (gets better over time)
|
||
- **Documented** audit trail (full transparency)
|
||
- **Proactive** pattern recognition
|
||
|
||
### Cost Savings
|
||
|
||
- **70-80% reduction** in operational overhead for common issues
|
||
- **Faster** mean time to resolution (MTTR)
|
||
- **Fewer** escalations
|
||
- **Better** resource utilization
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🚦 Rollout Strategy
|
||
|
||
### Phase 1: Pilot (Week 1-2)
|
||
- Enable for **cache/restart operations only**
|
||
- **5% of tickets**
|
||
- Require approval for all
|
||
- Monitor closely
|
||
|
||
### Phase 2: Expansion (Week 3-4)
|
||
- Add **safe network operations**
|
||
- **20% of tickets**
|
||
- Auto-approve if reliability ≥ 95%
|
||
- Collect feedback aggressively
|
||
|
||
### Phase 3: Scale (Week 5-6)
|
||
- Enable for **all safe operations**
|
||
- **50% of tickets**
|
||
- Auto-approve if reliability ≥ 90%
|
||
- Patterns becoming eligible
|
||
|
||
### Phase 4: Full Deployment (Week 7+)
|
||
- **All categories** (except security)
|
||
- **100% availability**
|
||
- Dynamic thresholds based on performance
|
||
- Continuous improvement
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📚 Documentation
|
||
|
||
New documentation added:
|
||
|
||
1. **AUTO_REMEDIATION_GUIDE.md** - Complete guide (THIS FILE)
|
||
2. **API_ENHANCED.md** - Enhanced API documentation
|
||
3. **RELIABILITY_SCORING.md** - Deep dive on scoring
|
||
4. **FEEDBACK_SYSTEM.md** - Feedback loop details
|
||
5. **PATTERN_LEARNING.md** - How patterns work
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎓 Training & Adoption
|
||
|
||
### For Operators:
|
||
|
||
1. Read **AUTO_REMEDIATION_GUIDE.md**
|
||
2. Start with low-risk categories
|
||
3. Always provide feedback
|
||
4. Monitor logs and analytics
|
||
5. Adjust thresholds based on results
|
||
|
||
### For Administrators:
|
||
|
||
1. Configure **auto_remediation_policies**
|
||
2. Set appropriate thresholds per category
|
||
3. Define approval workflows
|
||
4. Monitor system performance
|
||
5. Review and approve critical actions
|
||
|
||
### For Developers:
|
||
|
||
1. Integrate API endpoints
|
||
2. Implement feedback collection
|
||
3. Use reliability scores in decisions
|
||
4. Monitor metrics and alerts
|
||
5. Contribute to pattern improvement
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🔄 Migration from v1.0
|
||
|
||
### Breaking Changes:
|
||
|
||
**None!** v2.0 is fully backward compatible.
|
||
|
||
- Existing tickets continue to work
|
||
- Auto-remediation is opt-in
|
||
- All v1.0 APIs still functional
|
||
|
||
### New Defaults:
|
||
|
||
- `enable_auto_remediation: false` (explicit opt-in required)
|
||
- `requires_approval: true` (by default)
|
||
- `min_reliability_score: 85.0`
|
||
|
||
### Database Migration:
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Run Alembic migrations
|
||
poetry run alembic upgrade head
|
||
|
||
# Migrations add new tables:
|
||
# - ticket_feedbacks
|
||
# - similar_tickets
|
||
# - remediation_logs
|
||
# - auto_remediation_policies
|
||
# - remediation_approvals
|
||
# - ticket_patterns
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎉 Summary
|
||
|
||
**v2.0 adds intelligent, safe, self-improving auto-remediation:**
|
||
|
||
1. ✅ AI can now fix problems automatically (disabled by default)
|
||
2. ✅ Multi-factor reliability scoring (gets smarter over time)
|
||
3. ✅ Human feedback loop (continuous learning)
|
||
4. ✅ Pattern recognition (learns from similar issues)
|
||
5. ✅ Approval workflow (safety for critical actions)
|
||
6. ✅ Full audit trail (complete transparency)
|
||
7. ✅ Progressive automation (starts conservative, scales based on success)
|
||
|
||
**The system learns from every interaction and gets better over time!**
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📞 Support
|
||
|
||
- **Email**: automation-team@company.local
|
||
- **Slack**: #datacenter-automation
|
||
- **Documentation**: /docs/auto-remediation
|
||
- **Issues**: git.company.local/infrastructure/datacenter-docs/issues
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Ready to try auto-remediation? Start with a low-risk ticket and let the AI show you what it can do!** 🚀
|