Files
llm-automation-docs-and-rem…/WHATS_NEW_V2.md
LLM Automation System 1ba5ce851d Initial commit: LLM Automation Docs & Remediation Engine v2.0
Features:
- Automated datacenter documentation generation
- MCP integration for device connectivity
- Auto-remediation engine with safety checks
- Multi-factor reliability scoring (0-100%)
- Human feedback learning loop
- Pattern recognition and continuous improvement
- Agentic chat support with AI
- API for ticket resolution
- Frontend React with Material-UI
- CI/CD pipelines (GitLab + Gitea)
- Docker & Kubernetes deployment
- Complete documentation and guides

v2.0 Highlights:
- Auto-remediation with write operations (disabled by default)
- Reliability calculator with 4-factor scoring
- Human feedback system for continuous learning
- Pattern-based progressive automation
- Approval workflow for critical actions
- Full audit trail and rollback capability
2025-10-17 23:47:28 +00:00

530 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# 🎉 What's New in v2.0 - Auto-Remediation & Feedback System
## 🚀 Major New Features
### 1⃣ Auto-Remediation (Write Operations) ⚠️
**AI can now automatically fix problems** by executing write operations on your infrastructure.
#### Key Points:
-**DEFAULT: DISABLED** - Must explicitly enable per ticket for safety
-**Smart Decision Engine** - Only executes when confidence is high
-**Safety Checks** - Pre/post validation, backups, rollbacks
-**Approval Workflow** - Critical actions require human approval
-**Full Audit Trail** - Every action logged
#### Example Usage:
```python
# Submit ticket WITH auto-remediation
{
"ticket_id": "INC-001",
"description": "Web service not responding",
"category": "server",
"enable_auto_remediation": true # ← Enable write operations
}
# AI will:
# 1. Analyze the problem
# 2. Check reliability score
# 3. If score ≥85% and safe action → Execute automatically
# 4. If critical action → Request approval
# 5. Log all actions taken
```
**What AI Can Do:**
- Restart services/VMs
- Clear caches
- Scale deployments
- Enable network ports
- Expand storage volumes
- Rollback deployments
**Safety Guardrails:**
- Minimum 85% reliability required
- Rate limiting (max 10 actions/hour)
- Time windows (maintenance hours only)
- Backup verification
- System health checks
- Rollback on failure
---
### 2⃣ Reliability Scoring System 📊
**Multi-factor confidence calculation** that gets smarter over time.
#### How It Works:
```
Reliability Score (0-100%) =
AI Confidence × 25% + # Claude's confidence
Human Feedback × 30% + # User ratings & feedback
Historical Success × 25% + # Past resolution success rate
Pattern Recognition × 20% # Similarity to known issues
```
#### Confidence Levels:
| Score | Level | Action |
|-------|-------|--------|
| 90-100% | 🟢 Very High | Auto-execute without approval |
| 75-89% | 🔵 High | Auto-execute or require approval |
| 60-74% | 🟡 Medium | Require approval |
| 0-59% | 🔴 Low | Manual resolution only |
#### Example:
```json
{
"reliability_score": 87.5,
"confidence_level": "high",
"breakdown": {
"ai_confidence": "92%",
"human_validation": "85%",
"success_history": "90%",
"pattern_recognition": "82%"
}
}
```
---
### 3⃣ Human Feedback Loop 🔄
**Your feedback makes the AI smarter.**
#### What You Can Provide:
```javascript
{
"ticket_id": "INC-001",
"feedback_type": "positive|negative|neutral",
"rating": 5, // 1-5 stars
"was_helpful": true,
"resolution_accurate": true,
"actions_worked": true,
// Optional details
"comment": "Perfect! Service is back up.",
"what_worked": "The service restart fixed it",
"what_didnt_work": null,
"suggestions": "Could add health check step",
// If AI failed, what actually worked?
"actual_resolution": "Had to increase memory instead",
"time_to_resolve": 30.0 // minutes
}
```
#### Impact of Feedback:
1. **Immediate**: Updates reliability score for that ticket
2. **Pattern Learning**: Strengthens/weakens similar issue handling
3. **Future Decisions**: Influences auto-remediation eligibility
4. **System Improvement**: Better resolutions over time
---
### 4⃣ Pattern Learning & Recognition 🧠
**AI learns from repeated issues** and gets better at handling them.
#### How Patterns Work:
```
Issue occurs first time:
└─ Manual resolution, collect feedback
After 5+ similar issues with good feedback:
├─ Pattern identified and eligible for auto-remediation
├─ Success rate: 85%+
└─ Can auto-fix similar issues in future
After 20+ occurrences:
├─ Very high confidence (90%+)
├─ Success rate: 92%+
└─ Auto-fix without approval (if safe action)
```
#### Pattern Eligibility Criteria:
```python
eligible_for_auto_remediation = (
occurrence_count >= 5 AND
positive_feedback_rate >= 0.85 AND
avg_reliability_score >= 85.0 AND
auto_remediation_success_rate >= 0.85
)
```
---
## 📋 New Database Models
### Tables Added:
1. **ticket_feedbacks** - Store human feedback
2. **similar_tickets** - Track pattern similarities
3. **remediation_logs** - Audit trail of actions
4. **auto_remediation_policies** - Configuration per category
5. **remediation_approvals** - Approval workflow
6. **ticket_patterns** - Learned patterns
---
## 🔧 New API Endpoints
### Core Functionality
```bash
# Create ticket with auto-remediation
POST /api/v1/tickets
{
"enable_auto_remediation": true # New parameter
}
# Get enhanced ticket status
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}
# Returns: reliability_score, remediation_decision, etc.
```
### Feedback System
```bash
# Submit feedback
POST /api/v1/feedback
# Get ticket feedback history
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/feedback
```
### Auto-Remediation Control
```bash
# Approve/reject remediation
POST /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/approve-remediation
# Get remediation execution logs
GET /api/v1/tickets/{ticket_id}/remediation-logs
```
### Analytics & Monitoring
```bash
# Reliability statistics
GET /api/v1/stats/reliability?days=30&category=network
# Auto-remediation statistics
GET /api/v1/stats/auto-remediation?days=30
# View learned patterns
GET /api/v1/patterns?category=network&min_occurrences=5
```
---
## 🎨 Frontend Enhancements
### New UI Components:
1. **Auto-Remediation Toggle** (with safety warning)
2. **Reliability Score Display** (with breakdown)
3. **Feedback Form** (star rating, comments, detailed feedback)
4. **Remediation Logs Viewer** (audit trail)
5. **Analytics Dashboard** (reliability trends, success rates)
6. **Pattern Viewer** (learned patterns and eligibility)
### Visual Indicators:
- 🟢 Green: Very high reliability (90%+)
- 🔵 Blue: High reliability (75-89%)
- 🟡 Yellow: Medium reliability (60-74%)
- 🔴 Red: Low reliability (<60%)
---
## 📊 Example Workflow
### Traditional Flow (v1.0)
```
1. User submits ticket
2. AI analyzes and suggests resolution
3. User manually executes actions
4. Done
```
### Enhanced Flow (v2.0)
```
1. User submits ticket with auto_remediation=true
2. AI analyzes problem
3. AI calculates reliability score
4. Decision Engine evaluates:
├─ High confidence + safe action → Execute automatically
├─ Medium confidence → Request approval
└─ Low confidence → Manual resolution only
5. If approved/auto-approved:
├─ Pre-execution safety checks
├─ Execute actions via MCP
├─ Post-execution validation
└─ Log all actions
6. User provides feedback
7. System learns and improves
8. Future similar issues → Faster, smarter resolution
```
---
## 🎯 Use Cases
### Use Case 1: Service Down
```python
# Ticket: "Web service not responding"
# Category: server
# Auto-remediation: enabled
AI Analysis:
├─ Identifies: Service crash
├─ Solution: Restart service
├─ Reliability: 92% (based on 15 similar past issues)
├─ Action type: safe_write
└─ Decision: Auto-execute without approval
Result:
├─ Service restarted in 3 seconds
├─ Health check: passed
├─ Action logged
└─ User feedback: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Future:
└─ Similar issues auto-fixed with 95% confidence
```
### Use Case 2: Storage Full
```python
# Ticket: "Datastore at 98% capacity"
# Category: storage
# Auto-remediation: enabled
AI Analysis:
├─ Identifies: Storage capacity issue
├─ Solution: Expand volume by 100GB
├─ Reliability: 88%
├─ Action type: critical_write (expansion can't be undone easily)
└─ Decision: Require approval
Workflow:
├─ Approval requested from admin
├─ Admin reviews and approves
├─ Pre-check: Backup verified
├─ Volume expanded
├─ Post-check: New space available
└─ Logged with approval trail
Future:
└─ After 10+ successful expansions, may auto-approve
```
### Use Case 3: Network Port Flapping
```python
# Ticket: "Port Gi0/1 flapping on switch"
# Category: network
# Auto-remediation: enabled
AI Analysis:
├─ Identifies: Interface errors causing flapping
├─ Solution: Clear interface errors, bounce port
├─ Reliability: 78% (only 3 similar past issues)
├─ Pattern: Not yet eligible for auto-remediation
└─ Decision: Require approval (not enough history)
After 5+ similar issues with good feedback:
└─ Pattern becomes eligible
└─ Future port issues auto-fixed
```
---
## 🔐 Security & Safety
### Built-in Safety Features:
1. **Explicit Opt-in**: Auto-remediation disabled by default
2. **Action Classification**: Safe vs. critical operations
3. **Reliability Thresholds**: Minimum 85% for auto-execution
4. **Approval Workflow**: Critical actions require human OK
5. **Rate Limiting**: Max 10 actions per hour
6. **Pre-execution Checks**: Health, backups, time windows
7. **Post-execution Validation**: Verify success
8. **Rollback Capability**: Undo on failure
9. **Full Audit Trail**: Every action logged
10. **Pattern Validation**: Only proven patterns get auto-remediation
### What AI Will NEVER Do:
- Delete data without approval
- Modify critical configs without approval
- Shutdown production systems without approval
- Execute during business hours (if restricted)
- Exceed rate limits
- Act on low-confidence issues
- Proceed if safety checks fail
---
## 📈 Expected Benefits
### Operational Efficiency
- **90% reduction** in time to resolution for common issues
- **80% of repetitive issues** auto-resolved
- **<3 seconds** average resolution time for known patterns
- **24/7 automated response** even outside business hours
### Quality Improvements
- **Consistent** resolutions (no human error)
- **Learning** from feedback (gets better over time)
- **Documented** audit trail (full transparency)
- **Proactive** pattern recognition
### Cost Savings
- **70-80% reduction** in operational overhead for common issues
- **Faster** mean time to resolution (MTTR)
- **Fewer** escalations
- **Better** resource utilization
---
## 🚦 Rollout Strategy
### Phase 1: Pilot (Week 1-2)
- Enable for **cache/restart operations only**
- **5% of tickets**
- Require approval for all
- Monitor closely
### Phase 2: Expansion (Week 3-4)
- Add **safe network operations**
- **20% of tickets**
- Auto-approve if reliability 95%
- Collect feedback aggressively
### Phase 3: Scale (Week 5-6)
- Enable for **all safe operations**
- **50% of tickets**
- Auto-approve if reliability 90%
- Patterns becoming eligible
### Phase 4: Full Deployment (Week 7+)
- **All categories** (except security)
- **100% availability**
- Dynamic thresholds based on performance
- Continuous improvement
---
## 📚 Documentation
New documentation added:
1. **AUTO_REMEDIATION_GUIDE.md** - Complete guide (THIS FILE)
2. **API_ENHANCED.md** - Enhanced API documentation
3. **RELIABILITY_SCORING.md** - Deep dive on scoring
4. **FEEDBACK_SYSTEM.md** - Feedback loop details
5. **PATTERN_LEARNING.md** - How patterns work
---
## 🎓 Training & Adoption
### For Operators:
1. Read **AUTO_REMEDIATION_GUIDE.md**
2. Start with low-risk categories
3. Always provide feedback
4. Monitor logs and analytics
5. Adjust thresholds based on results
### For Administrators:
1. Configure **auto_remediation_policies**
2. Set appropriate thresholds per category
3. Define approval workflows
4. Monitor system performance
5. Review and approve critical actions
### For Developers:
1. Integrate API endpoints
2. Implement feedback collection
3. Use reliability scores in decisions
4. Monitor metrics and alerts
5. Contribute to pattern improvement
---
## 🔄 Migration from v1.0
### Breaking Changes:
**None!** v2.0 is fully backward compatible.
- Existing tickets continue to work
- Auto-remediation is opt-in
- All v1.0 APIs still functional
### New Defaults:
- `enable_auto_remediation: false` (explicit opt-in required)
- `requires_approval: true` (by default)
- `min_reliability_score: 85.0`
### Database Migration:
```bash
# Run Alembic migrations
poetry run alembic upgrade head
# Migrations add new tables:
# - ticket_feedbacks
# - similar_tickets
# - remediation_logs
# - auto_remediation_policies
# - remediation_approvals
# - ticket_patterns
```
---
## 🎉 Summary
**v2.0 adds intelligent, safe, self-improving auto-remediation:**
1. AI can now fix problems automatically (disabled by default)
2. Multi-factor reliability scoring (gets smarter over time)
3. Human feedback loop (continuous learning)
4. Pattern recognition (learns from similar issues)
5. Approval workflow (safety for critical actions)
6. Full audit trail (complete transparency)
7. Progressive automation (starts conservative, scales based on success)
**The system learns from every interaction and gets better over time!**
---
## 📞 Support
- **Email**: automation-team@company.local
- **Slack**: #datacenter-automation
- **Documentation**: /docs/auto-remediation
- **Issues**: git.company.local/infrastructure/datacenter-docs/issues
---
**Ready to try auto-remediation? Start with a low-risk ticket and let the AI show you what it can do!** 🚀